American Indians and Free

Ameri brush aside Indians and Freedom EssayAmerican Indians have striven for freedom ceaselessly since the colonization in 1800s. But for unlike American Indians, the definitions of freedom vary a lot. For the chief Seattle, the generator of legitimate school text OF CHIEF SEATTLES TREATY ORATION 1854, the freedom means the right hands to live with the nature harmoniously and to keep their righteousness and traditions. For Carlos Montezuma, the generator of Let My People Go, the definition of freedom is very absolute and stems from policy-making rights. His freedom means the rights of managing the stuffs of American Indians exclusively without the control of ashen man. From my point of view, the definition of freedom to American Indians is much close to its political definition because the rights of protecting the holy nature pass on non be given if they lose the political rights. But I argue that the real freedom does non mean the absolute free. Moreover, the chief Seattle and Carlos Montezuma dissent in the issue about whether American Indians should meet the focussing of colonists. For the chief Seattle, he thinks him and his people can accept the management of colonists on the condition that the colonists will not destroy their holy nature.For Carlos Montezuma, he asks the colonists not to interfere the issue of American Indians because the corrupt management of the colonists. I think that American Indians can accept the management of the colonists if they can proclaim enough political rights. The best way is to contend for a republic musical arrangement and government for American Indians rather than just asking for leaving the control of the colonists. It is obvious that the ii writers own quite different understandings when they face with the same wordfreedom, as I mentioned at the beginning.The writer of AUTHENTIC TEXT OF CHIEF SEATTLES TREATY ORATION 1854 shows deep love to his ancestors and the things his ancestors leave for the m. He uses quasi-religious to describe its ancestors and hallowed ground, verdant valleys, murmuring rivers and so on to describe his living environment. Also, the writer thinks that their religion is the Great Spirit and gives them in solemn hours of the night. Yet, in the perspectives of these American Indians, the colonists refuse to accept and heed the holy nature and ancestors of Africa Americans.The writer writes, Your God is not our God Your God loves your people and hates mine The retell indicates that American Indians in Seattle fear deeply that the colonial rule will ruin their living environment, religion and traditions. Hence, for the writer, their freedom means the respect of their ending. Nevertheless, Carlos Montezuma, the writer of Let My People Go, asks for totally different freedom. He writes, The Indian Bureau is the only obstacle that stands in the way that hinders our peoples freedom. , when the Indians will requirement the most help in this world , the Indian.Bureau will cease to exist and the Indian employees in the Indian Service their personality is destroyedthey have nothing to say. These inverted comma express the strong involuntary of American Indians to escape from the control of exsanguine Americans because of the corruption of Indian Bureau. So, the definition of freedom to Carlos Montezuma is the rights to express their own willing and achieve more political rights. I quite agree with Carlos Montezuma because he wants to ask for more political rights.Even if the Big Chief at Washington promised that the new colonists will respect the culture of the American Indians in Seattle, he can easily renege on the promise without the political rights or the protection of the law. On the other hand, the chief Seattle and Carlos Montezuma own different attitudes towards the issue about the management of white American. Carlos Montezuma hastily wants to abolish the Indian Bureau system rather than improve the system. Carlos Montez uma writes, The Indian Bureau system is wrong. The only way to adjust wrong is to abolish it, and the only reform is to let my people go. The quote expresses the urgent willing of Carlos Montezuma to stop the run of the wrong system. He owns the opinion to escape the control of White Americans. However, I think that American Indians can accept the management of colonists only if the colonists launch laws to protect the American Indians and give them enough political rights. The opinion of stopping the run of the system is too arbitrary and naive. It is super possible that a ruder way to manage the American Indians cookd after the abolition of the old system.Carlos Montezuma cannot accept the management of White Americans at all. But the chief Seattles requirements related to the acceptance of the White Americans management possibly is without much consideration. The chief Seattle writes, But should we accept it, I here and now make this condition that we will not be denied the pr ivilege without molestation of visiting at any time the tombs of our ancestors, friends, and children. The quote has insinuation that the chief Seattle will accept the colonial rule on the condition that the colonists will not infract their ancestors, friends and children. And in the same paragraph, the writer emphasizes the importance to protect their holly hillsides, valleys, plains and so on again.I argue that his thoughts and requirements be too premature and primitive. These are the basic rights for human beings. Even these rights are promised to give these American Indiana, they are still far away from freedom, as I regard it. Therefore, the real freedom cannot be achieved every by abolishing a wrong system and totally losing control or by asking for so limited rights and show mixed bagness or obedience to the colonists. Of course, freedom definitely is not what the Chief Seattle thinks.He views freedom as the rights on the foundation of compromise and only asks for poor limited rights. Besides, for me, freedom to a fault is not absolute like Carlos Montezuma thinks. It does not mean you can do what you want without others management and totally losing control. Freedom means you can own all the proper political rights under the protection of an ingenuous system or laws. The most significant issue for the real freedom is to create a right system or laws to protect the rights legally for these American Indians. No matter the chief Seattle or Carlos Montezuma, they both(prenominal) lack in the consciousness to create a right system or laws to protect themselves.If this kind of thing can be done, the existence of India Bureau or the colonial rule of White Americans does not matter to them at all. For this reason, it is so vital for American Indians and also other races to force the society to create a more and more impartial system ceaselessly. Works Cited Carlos Montezuma, Let My People Go An portion out delivered at the conference of the Society o f American Indians in Lawrence, Kansas, N. p n. p ,1915 Dr. Henry A. Smith, AUTHENTIC TEXT OF CHIEF SEATTLES TREATY ORATION 1854, N. p n. p ,1887.